The conceptual model of self-realization of future clinical psychologists
AbstractWe emphasize once again that the phenomenon of self-realization is a complex and multidimensional education, which is characterized by inconsistency and ambiguity. Therefore, the study of the manifestations of self-realization is faced with the methodological difficulty of finding valid instruments that would allow recording quantitative and qualitative parameters of realization of a subject. It is necessary to state: we at the stage when is the search for this Toolkit. And our work is one of attempts to study the process of self-realization. Therefore, in our research we adhere to the main provisions of humanistic approach to the study of personality, namely the personality is unique and holistic; personality is an open system; personality is an active system in which there are two types’ interactions each other forces: one type of power comes out of protection and reliability (this force is prone to regression, and attachment to the past: a man is afraid to take risks, she's afraid to hurt what is already is); the second type of forces directs us forward to wholeness, to the uniqueness of the individual, to the full functioning of all his strength, to trust to the outside world, where you can open your existing deep identity (Maslow, 1999; Fadiman, G1994). In the study we also draw on basic principles in the study of the process of development and formation of personality: unity of consciousness and activity, determinism, development of consciousness and personality in operation.
Maslow, A. (1999). New frontiers of human nature. Moscow. Smysl. [In Russian]
Frankl, V. (1990). Man's search for meaning. Moscow: Progress. [In Russian]
Fadiman, G. (1994). Personality and personal. Moscow: Publishing house of the Russian open University. [In Russian]
Vahromov, E. E. (2006). Self-actualization specialist manager in professional work: challenges and opportunities Retrieved from: http:/hpsy. Ru// public / social. [In Russian]
Erikson, E. (1996). Identity: youth and crisis. Moscow: Progress. [In Russian]
Kucerovsky, N. A. (2006). The Concept. Journal of the practicing psychologist, 12, 109-121. [In Russian]
Pfetiskin N. P. Kozlov V. V., Manuilov G. M. (2002). Socio-psychological diagnostics of personality development and small groups. Moscow: Publishing house of Institute of Psychotherapy. [In Russian]
Vasylyuk, V. F. (1984). Experiences Psychology: An Analysis of overcoming critical situations. Moscow: Moscow University Press. [In Russian]
Tsekhmister, Ya.V. (2002). Theory and practice of pre-professional training of students in lyceums of medical profile at higher educational institutions (dissertation of the doctor of pedagogical sciences). Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Professional Education of the Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv.
Tsekhmister, Ya. (2014). Paradigm analysis of the personality sociogenesis. Fundamental and applied researches in practice of leading scientific schools, 6, 169-173.
Leontief, A. N. (1977). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. M.: Politizdat. [In Russian]
Stolyarchuk, E. A. (2010). Dynamics of self-esteem of students in terms of experiences of the crisis the availability of professional. Actual problems of psychology: personality Psychology. Psychological assistance personality: collection of Sciences. Ave. In-TA psychology. G. S. Kostiuk of ANP of Ukraine, 11, 3, 389-396. [In Russian]
Abstract views: 41 PDF Downloads: 23