Genesis of a poly-systemic integrity of the personality


  • E. Geyko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University named after Volodymyr Vynnychenko
Keywords: genesis, poly-systemic integrity of the personality, self-organization, integrity, integrity of the personality

Abstract

The article specifies that integrity is one of fundamental properties of complex formations (systems); properties and demands of a whole are considered as important determinants of development, and development of integrity of a personality is its criterion.The most important factors which promote development of integrity of a personality are allocated, namely: "creative life", "self-implementation", "motivation", "cognitive requirement", "effectiveness", " significance", "inwardness", " spontaneity", "image of the world, image of а man", "respectfulness".It has been proved that poly-systemic integrity of a personality is characterized by a multidimensionality (various structure of integrities). Such multidimensionality differs in distribution by criterion of differentiation to polar categories (systems, modalities, and dispositions), bi-polar categories (bi-sуstems, bi-modalities and bi-dispositions.). The systems, the modalities, the bi-modality and the bi-disposition represent multi-ordinal modes of poly-systemic integrity of the personality. Through them multidimensional nature of the organization of the poly-systemic integrity of the personality is shown.- The theoretical model of the poly-systemic integrity of a personality is presented in the form of several spheres that are implicated in each other, are interpenetrated one in one and are interconnected by system bonds (sub-modalities in polar categories and polar categories in bi-polar categories). So the system organization is represented by the following levels: sub modalities, polar categories and bipolar categories. The level structures and inter-level structures are represented accordingly. Thus the integral integrity represents structural integrities that are interconnected.

References

Ananiev, B.G. (1980). Selected psychological works / Boris Gerasimovich Ananiev: In 2 volumes, V. I. - M .: Pedagogic.
Dorfman, L. Y., Ryabikova, M.V., Goldberg, I.M., Bykov, A.N., Vedrov, A.A. (2000). New version of the Perm questionnaire Me. Perm: Perm State Institute of Art and Culture, 179-183.
Dorfman, L.Y. (Ed.) (2004). Integral individuality, self-concept, personality / - Moscow: Smysl.
Kapustina, A.N. (2001). Multifactorial personal technique of R. Cattell. St. Petersburg, 55-81, 96-97.
Merlin, V.S. (1986). Essay on the integral study of individuality. Moscow: Pedagogy.
Sobchyk, L. N. (2003). Modified Sondi technique. Test of eight attractions. St. Petersburg: Rech.
Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. (2008). Differential psychology: tutorial. 3rd ed., Rev. Moscow: Flint.
Skovoroda, G. (2011). Complete academic collection of works. Kharkiv-Edmonton-Toronto: Maidan; Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies.
Stolin, V.V., Pantilieiev, S.R. (1988). Questionnaire of self-relation. Practicum on psycho diagnostics: Psycho diagnostic materials. Moscow, 123-130.
Tolman, E. (1980). Behavior as a molar phenomenon. M oscow.: Ed. MSU, 1980.

Abstract views: 51
PDF Downloads: 37
Published
2017-04-22
How to Cite
Geyko, E. (2017). Genesis of a poly-systemic integrity of the personality. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 20(2), 71-76. Retrieved from https://farplss.org/index.php/journal/article/view/209