The development of Ukrainian entrepreneurs way of life: personal vector

  • S. Ianovska V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
Keywords: entrepreneurship; activity; way of life; personality


The definition of lifestyle in psychology is traditionally associated with various aspects of the development of personality and social groups. The way of life depends not only on objective social factors, but also on a person himself, on what external and internal activity he represents in the objective process of life. Thus, the formation and development of personality is reflected in his activity increasing in preserving or transforming own way of life. One of the main features of the present is the existence of such social group as entrepreneurs. The development of this social group is connected with the formation of the independence of our state and the activation of a certain social stratum of the development of entrepreneurial way of life. Entrepreneurship in Ukraine has been developing ever since 1991. During the years of independence in Ukraine, the socio-economic situation has changed significantly. Favorable socio-economic conditions of the early 2000s have increased the activity of people to transform their own way of life and the realization of entrepreneurial activity. We were interested in how this was reflected in the development of socio-psychological qualities of an individual. The purpose of our research is to determine the socio-psychological peculiarities of the individual in the making a way of life for entrepreneurs at different stages of small business development in independent Ukraine (in the 1990s and in the period from 2010 to 2014). The following methods and techniques were used. 16 PF Kettell (Form C) adaptation A. G. Shmelev, V. I. Pohilko, A. S. Solovaychik, the method of personal differentiation (V. F. Bazhin, E. A. Golinkina, A. M. Etkind), the method of determining the level of subjective control (V. F. Bazhin, E. A. Golinkina, A. M. Etkind), the method of graphical scaling D. Guilford for determining the level of risk, the test-questionnaire for the diagnosis of the presence and severity degree of the main psychological barriers for entrepreneurship (O. P. Ermolaeva), the method of pair comparisons of L. Terstoun, methods "Self-Cost" and "New social status" O. M. Laktionov, the method of determining the severity of entrepreneurial activity indicators of S. G. Ianovska. Mathematical-statistical processing of results was carried out using a number of mathematical statistics methods (Mann-Whitney U-criterion, Student's t-criterion). A comparative analysis of the socio-psychological qualities of entrepreneur’s personality at different stages of small business development in Ukraine revealed that the transformation that has occurred over the time is manifested in the following features: increasing the role of the communicative unit of a personality profile of an entrepreneurial entity, increasing the internal locus of control and the value of economic wealth values in regulating the entrepreneurial activity. The role of the professional component of entrepreneurial professional activity is changing: the importance of professional knowledge and special training in running business is growing. The results of the study were used to create a training program for the development of entrepreneurial activity, which was implemented during the last year in work with internal immigrants and start-uppers.


Abulkhanova, K. A. (1973). About the Subject of Mental Activity. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian].
Абульханова, К. А. (1973). О субъекте психической деятельности. М.: Наука.
Ananiev, B. G. (1977). On the Problems of Modern Human Science. Moscow: Science. - 381 p. [In Russian].
Ананьев, Б. Г. (1977). О проблемах современного человекознания. М.: Наука. – 381 с.
Ermolayeva, E. P. (2007). Psychology of entrepreneurship: psychological barriers - a brake on the way of mass entrepreneurship. Samara: Bakhrakh-M, - p. 632-665. [In Russian].
Ермолаева, Е. П. (2007). Психология предпринимательства: психологические барьеры – тормоз на пути массового предпринимательства. Самара : Бахрах-М, – С. 632-665.
Ianovskaya, S. G. (2013). Socio-economic and psychological signs of entrepreneurship. Problems of modern psychology: Collection of scientific works of Kamyanets-Podilskyi Ivan Ogienko National University, Institute of Psychology named after G. S. Kostiuk NAPS of Ukraine. In S. D. Maksimenko, L.A. Onufriyeva (Eds.). Is. 21. Kamyanets-Podilsky: Axioma. P.799-809. [In Ukrainian].
Яновська, С.Г. (2013). Соціально–економічні та психологічні ознаки підприємництва. Проблеми сучасної психології: Збірник наукових праць Кам'янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г.С. Костюка НАПН України. С.Д. Максименка, Л.А. Онуфрієвої (Ред.). Вип. 21. Кам'янець-Подільський: Аксіома. С.799-809.
Gusev, A.N., Izmailov, C.A., Mikhalevskaya, M.B. (1998). Measurement in psychology: a general psychological practice. - M.: Sense. - 286 p. [In Russian].
Гусев, А. Н., Измайлов, Ч.А., Михалевская, М.Б. (1998). Измерение в психологии: общий психологический практикум. - М.: Смысл. - 286 с.
Laktionov, O. M. (2000). Structural and dynamic organization of individual experience. dis ... Doctor of Psychological Sciences: 19.00.01. K. - 374 p.
Лактіонов, О.М. (2000). Структурно-динамічна організація індивідуального досвіду. дис. … доктора психологічних наук: 19.00.01. К. – 374 с.
Lomov, B. F. (1984). Methodological and Theoretical Problems of Psychology. - Moscow: Nauka. - 444 p. [In Russian].
Ломов, Б.Ф. (1984). Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. - М.: Наука. — 444 с.
Moskalenko, A.T.& Sergeantov, V. F. (1984). Personality as an Object of Philosophical Knowledge. Philosophical Theory of Personality and its Psychological and Biological Grounds - Novosibirsk: Nauka.- 319 p. [In Russian].
Москаленко, А.Т., Сержантов, В.Ф. (1984). Личность как предмет философского познания. Философская теория личности и ее психологические и биологические основания – Новосибирск: Наука. - 319 с.
Nekrasova, I. N. (2011). Way of Life as a Construct of System Research in Psychology. Retrieved from: http: // / portal / Soc_Gum / Mdtss / Psychology / 2011 / R1% 5CR1S6.pdf. [In Russian].
Некрасова, И. Н. (2011). Образ жизни как конструкт системных исследований в психологии. Режим доступа: http: // /portal/ Soc_Gum / Mdtss /Psychology/ 2011 / R1%5CR1S6.pdf.
Raigorodsky, D. Ya. (2011). Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and tests. M.: Bakhrakh-M. - 672s. [In Russian].
Райгородский, Д. Я. (2011). Практическая психодиагностика. Методика и тесты. М.:Бахрах-М. – 672с.
Rubinshtein, S. L. (2002) Fundamentals of General Psychology. - St. Petersburg: Peter. - 720 p. [In Russian].
Рубинштейн, С.Л. (2002). Основы общей психологии. – СПб.: Питер. – 720 с.
Sergeantov, V. F. (1990). Man, his nature and the meaning of life. - Leningrad: Publishing House of Leningrad University. - 360 p. [In Russian].
Сержантов, В. Ф. (1990). Человек, его природа и смысл бытия. – Л.: Изд-во Ленинградского университета. – 360 с.
Shvalb, Yu. M. (2016). Investigation of personal determinants of a way of life. Actual problems of psychology: Sb. sciences Works of the Institute of Psychology named after G. S. Kostiuk NAPS of Ukraine. Volume 7. Is.42. p. 213-228. [In Ukrainian].
Швалб, Ю. М. (2016). Дослідження особистісних детермінант способу життя. Актуальні проблеми психології: зб. наук. праць Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Том 7. Вип.42. с. 213-228.
Tolstykh, V. I. (1975). The way of life. Concepts, reality, problems. - M.: Politizdat. - 236 p. [In Russian].
Толстых В. И. (1975). Образ жизни. Понятия, реальность, проблемы. – М.: Политиздат. – 236 с.
Retrieved from:
How to Cite
Ianovska, S. (2018). The development of Ukrainian entrepreneurs way of life: personal vector. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 27(3), 7-14. Retrieved from