Style of conflict behavior for educational workers as factor of them subjective prosperity
AbstractIn researching article were shown and researching so extraordinarily actual theme, that consists in illumination of scientific approaches in relation to subjective prosperity of both personality on the whole and workers of education, is considered in an offer article and investigational, in particular. Authorial position consists in a statement, that subjective prosperity of educational workers it depends on style of conflict behavior in a collective. The row of authors that studied the problem of productive conflicts in an educational environment is given. Psychological features and specific of concept "subjective prosperity" are analyzed personalities and "subjective prosperity" of educational workers. In the article methodologies of research of workers of education offer and reasonable on select subjects. Basic descriptions of conflict behavior of teachers were given and results were gotten. The analysis of the got results is conducted from positions of effective conflict that for the sake of receipt of subjective prosperity can use ineffective strategies of decision of conflicts. The mental condition of educational workers is analyzed. Intercommunication of conflict behavior style, features of mental conditions and state of subjective prosperity of educational workers is marked. One of further directions of scientific search the further analysis of intercommunication of style behavior in a conflict and state of subjective prosperity is envisaged for the leaders of educational organizations and determination of basic elements of their improvement. Undertaken an empiric study gave possibility to shine the urgent problems of teachers in area of origin of conflict situations. Research envisaged the complex use of such methodologies "Diagnostics of strategies of decision for conflict situations" of D. Johnson and F. Johnson and "Self-appraisal of mental conditions" of G. Izenk". Styles of conflict behavior of workers of education (compulsion, smoothing, avoidance, compromise, collaboration) and levels of formed for mental conditions (alarm, frustration, aggressiveness, rigidity) are certain. Ready results, give an opportunity to assert about intercommunication of style by conflict behavior, features of mental conditions and state of subjective prosperity of educational workers. It follows to consider the given description of the state of subjective prosperity the main result of the conducted analysis, depending on style of conflict behavior of educational workers. It is thus well-proven that the successful use and effective management of conflict behavior styles can provide subjective prosperity of educational workers in end-point. The leaders of educational organizations and determination of basic elements of their improvement have a possible study of intercommunication of style of behavior in a conflict and state of subjective prosperity in further researches.
Bondarchuk,O., Karamushka, L., & Nezhinskaya, O. (2016). Psychological conditions for prevention and conflict resolution in educational organizations: special course. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Un-Management. education. [In Ukrainian].
Bondarchuk, O. (2008). Socio-psychological bases of personal development of heads of educational organizations: monograph 318. [In Ukrainian].
Dzyuba, T. (2005). A set of methods for diagnosing the psychological readiness of the school head to interact in a conflict. Poltava: POІППО. 64. [In Ukrainian].
Kashlyuk, Yu. (2016). The main factors that influence the psychological well-being of the individual, 34. Electronic resource. Access mode: http://problemps.kpnu.edu.ua/en/[In Russian].
Knyazeva, E. (2011). Satisfaction with life as a social phenomenon. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University named after V.N. Karazin. 941. 160-165. [In Russian].
Kulikov, L. (2004). Psychohygiene of the person. Questions of psychological stability and psychoprophylaxis: Textbook. 464. [In Russian].
Moskalova, A.S. (2017.). Subjective well-being of the individual as a psychological phenomenon. SWS Panasenko IM, 2017. 1. 97-99. [In Ukrainian].
Pashukova, T., & Dopira, A., & Dyakonov, G. V. (2000). Workshop on general psychology. "Knowledge". 204. [In Ukrainian].
Pozdnyakova, E. (2007). The concept of the phenomenon of "psychological well-being" inmodern psychology of personality. Psychological Journal. 3. 87-102. [In Russian].
Puchkova, G. (2003). Subjective well-being as a factor of personal self-actualization. Abstract 17. [In Russian].
Shevelenkova, T., & Fesenko, P. (2005). Psychological well-being of the person (review of the basic concepts and method of research). Psychological diagnostics. Psychological Institute of RAO. 3. 95-129. [In Russian].
Ryan, R., & E. Deci. (2000.) Self-detenrrination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being an, American Psychology. 55 (1).68–78.
Ryff, C. D. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 719–727
Abstract views: 70 PDF Downloads: 82