Joint and several liability and separate liability of the heirs for hereditable obligations – short comparative and historical overview


  • V. Petrov Sofia university "St. Kliment Ohridski "
Keywords: joint and several liability, separate liability, hereditable debts, hereditable obligations, Roman Law of obligations

Abstract

The article researches the different approaches for regulation of the liability of the heirs for hereditable obligations. Historical and comparative researches were made. The European legislations can be divided in two big groups. The legislations form the first group set a separate liability of the heirs - each one of them owes only a part of the debt equal to his share of the estate. The legislations of France, Ukraine, Bulgaria, etc. are included in this group. The legislations from the second group govern joint and several liability for the heirs. A creditor of the estate has a right to demand an enforcement of the whole size of hereditable obligation from one of the heirs and this enforcement releases all of the heirs from their liability. This group includes the civil legislations of German, Switzerland, Spain, Russian federation, Macedonia, etc. The author position is that the separate liability is more proper for regulation of the heir’s liability for hereditable debts. Historical, comparative and theleological methods are used for proof of this thesis. The historical development of this liability from Roman private law is traced and researched. A short overview of the aims of each one of the two kinds of liability is made in the article. The joint and several liability protects only the interest of the creditors of the estate. It is considered in the doctrine as a debt security. The separate liability protects the interest not only of the creditors, but of the heirs too. But only the liability for divisible obligations is separate. The liability for indivisible obligations is joint and liability. The separate liability can’t be applicable for them because of the specific of this kind of obligations.

References

Andreev, M. (1992) Roman private law. Sofia: Sofi-R. [in Bulgarian]
Bazanov, Iv. (1940) Cource by Roman law. Part II. Sofia. [in Bulgarian]
Girard, P. F. (1915) History and system of Roman Law. Part III. Sofia. [in Bulgarian];
Garrido, M. J. G. (2005) Roman private law. Translation form Spanish. Moscow. [in Russian]
Гаридо, М. Х. Г. (2005) Римско частно право. Превод от испански. Москва, 640
Kalaydjiev, A. (2016) Law of obligations. General part. Sofia. [in Bulgarian]
Mateeva, Ek. (2012) The German Succession Law as Applicable Law on Successions Concerning Immovable Property in Bulgaria. Sofia. [in Bulgarian]
Palandt, O. Commentaries on the German Civil Code. 61 rev. edition. Munich, Verlag C. H. Beck. [in German]
Palandt, O. Beck’sche Kurz-Kommentare. Band 7. Palandt Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 61., neubearbeitete Auflage, Verlag C.H.Beck, München,
Planiol, M. (1921) Elementary Treatise of Civil Law. Part VII. Inheritances. Sofia. [in Bulgarian]
Stoyanov, D. (2015) The conflict between the legal interests of the original owner and the good faith acquirer of movables – a comparative overview of the solutions. Challenges of the Knowledge Society, Bucharest. [in English]
Zimmermann, R. (1996) The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. New York, Oxford university press. [in English]

Abstract views: 44
PDF Downloads: 55
Published
2018-09-01
How to Cite
Petrov, V. (2018). Joint and several liability and separate liability of the heirs for hereditable obligations – short comparative and historical overview. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 28(4), 114-116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2018.4.21