Interpersonal interaction and the process of formation of the structure of educational and cognitive activity of students


  • L. Maryanenko G.S. Kostyuk Institute of Psychology of NAES of Ukraine
Keywords: interpersonal interaction; teacher’s ability; formation of cognitive activity of students; types of interpersonal interaction; experimental site.

Abstract

The article substantiates the definition of the teacher's ability to form the cognitive activity of students, in accordance with the structure of the phenomenon of cognitive activity.  The results of the empirical research are described in detail.  On the basis of the correlation analysis carried out, positive and negative qualities were identified, in particular, the types of interpersonal interaction that influence the teacher's ability to form the cognitive activity of the schoolchildren. According analysis positively on the ability of teachers to shape cognitive activity of pupils depends on the teacher’s ability to form cognitive motivation of students, promote positive emotional well-being of students in the classroom, the achievement of teacher interpersonal interaction with students through a democratic style of pedagogical communication; the ability to generate the mental abilities of the students. Also positively influenced by the presence of his own style of pedagogical communication of a teacher high in self-esteem of their own creativity and health. According to the correlation analysis, on the ability of the teacher to shape the cognitive activities of students negatively impact the liberal style of communication, responsibly-generous type of behavior, conformity, adaptive behavior; incredulous-skeptical type the behavior of teachers, namely the tendency to criticism, resentment, suspicion, disappointment in children.

References

Berns, R. (1986). Razvitie Ya-kontseptsii i vospitanie. Moskva: Progress.
Galazhinskiy, E. V. (2008). Sistemnaya determinatsiya samorealizatsii lichnosti. (Dis. d-ra psihol. nauk). Tomskiy gosudarstvennyiy universitet, Tomsk.
Kondrateva, S. V. (1976). Mezhlichnostnoe ponimanie i ego rol v obschenii. (Dis. d-ra psihol. nauk). Drogobyichskiy gosudarstvennyiy pedagogicheskiy institut im. I. Ya. Franko, Drogobyich.
Kuzmina, N. V. (1984). OdarYonnost pedagogov kak faktor razvitiya sposobnostey uchaschihsya. Problemyi sposobnostey v sovetskoy psihologii. (s. 101-106). Moskva.
Kuzmina, N. V. (1985). Sposobnosti, odarYonnost, talant uchitelya. Leningrad: Znanie.
Maksimenko, S. D. (2006). Geneza zdIysnennya osobistostI. KiYiv: Vidavnitstvo TOV «KMM».
Mar’yanenko, L. V. (2009) Eksperimentalne doslIdzhennya profesIynih zdIbnostey vchitelIv. S. D. Maksimenko (Red.) NaukovI zapiski Institutu psihologIYi Im. G.S. Kostyuka APN UkraYini (Vip. 37, s. 352-372). KiYiv: NIka-Tsentr.
Mey, R. (2006). Stanovlennya ekzistentsIynoYi psihologIYi – GumanIstichnI pIdhodi v zahIdnIy psihologIYi HH stolIttya. KiYiv: Pulsari.
Prakticheskaya psihologiya v testah, ili Kak nauchitsya ponimat sebya i drugih. (1998). Moskva: AST-PRESS.
Ryizhov, N.A. (1976). Informatsionnaya funktsiya – vazhneyshee zveno v strukture pedagogicheskoy deyatelnosti uchitelya. Psihologiya truda i lichnosti uchitelya (Vyip. 1, s. 47-71). Leningrad: LGPI im. A. I. Gertsena.
Fromm, E. (1999). Teoriya lyubvi. Psihologiya lichnosti. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.
Scherbakov, A.I. (1976). O metodologii i metodah izucheniya psihologii truda i lichnosti uchitelya. Psihologiya truda i lichnosti uchitelya (Vyip. 1, s. 3-29). Leningrad: LGPI im. A. I. Gertsena.
Entsiklopediya psihologicheskih testov. Professionalnoe konsultirovanie, professionalnyiy otbor, professionalnaya orientatsiya, testyi dlya bezrabotnyih. (1997). Moskva: OOO «Izdatelstvo AST».
Yung, K.-G. (1997). Chelovek i ego simvolyi. Moskva: B. S. K.
Published
2018-08-31
How to Cite
Maryanenko, L. (2018). Interpersonal interaction and the process of formation of the structure of educational and cognitive activity of students. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 29(5), 40-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2018.5.05