The cultural syndrome "individualism-collectivism" and its psychological peculiarities including well-being of regional communities' representatives in Ukraine


  • I.V. Danyliuk Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
  • I.V. Kozytska Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
  • S.O. Shykovets
Keywords: mentality of ethnic and regional communities; psychological well-being of ethnic and regional communities’ representatives; psychological components of mentality; structure of the cultural syndrome

Abstract

The study of the psychological components of the cultural stratum of Ukrainian mentality in general and of its regional peculiarities is quite important today, taking into account the peculiarities of social processes in the Ukrainian state and the transformation of the modern Ukrainians' consciousness. Particular attention is drawn to the cultural syndromes due to the great applicational value of a detailed study of their features among the representatives of the country's regional communities. It allows to distinguish the key features for depicting the psychological portraits of personalities of the regional communities' representatives. The results of the study help to systematize knowledge in the quantitative measurements of the cultural syndrome "individualism-collectivism" and to fill the gaps in ethnometric researches in Ukraine. It broadens the understanding of the structure and temporal dynamics of this cultural syndrome, its dependence on such factors as the age, the gender and the religiosity of personality. A practical application of the obtained results may include their use in psychological and pedagogical work, in business and cultural contacts, in interethnic communication, etc. In general, the results of the study are the basis for expanding the study of the psychological characteristics of the political consciousness of Ukrainians, which we intend to carry out in the future. This study will help to create a strategy for changing the worldview and behavioral patterns of Ukrainian society in order to allow effective counteraction to attempts of manipulations with human rights and personal freedom of people on the basis of their weakness (ignorance of modern features of important aspects of social existence and limited worldview). Also, the results can be used to help to create, to disseminate and to develop effectively regional projects of non-governmental organizations, international social, psychological and political projects, local self-government bodies, local and regional communities, regional initiatives, etc.

References

Benedict, R., 1934. Patterns of Culture, Boston-New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 260 p.
Boas, F., 1940. Race, Language, and Culture, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Danyliuk, I. V. (2013). Psychological analysis of the ethnic conflicts’ determinants. Ethnicity: Ukrainian Perspectives. (pp.123-129). Warsaw – Kiev (in English).
Danyliuk, I.V. & Shykovets, S.O. (2018). An attitude to nature: the dichotomy “human – nature” or the measure of human domination over nature as a cultural indicator. American Journal of Fundamental, Applied & Experimental Research, 1(8), 10-17.
Danyliuk, I.V., 2010. Ethnic psychology as a branch of scientific knowledge: the historical and theoretical dimension, K.: Summit Book, pp. 432.
Danyliuk, I.V., Shykovets, S.O. & Mambetova, A.A. (2017). Psychological peculiarities of mentality of the representatives of the regional communities in Ukraine as a key point for understanding of social crisis in Ukraine. International Journal of Education & Development, 2(1), 8-12.
Hofstede, G.H., 1984. Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 475 p.
Hofstede, G.H., 2003. Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 622 p.
Holzner, B., 2007. “C.K. Yang: Sociology in China and the Encounter of Civilizations”, in: Tang and Holzner, pp. 17–29.
Kluckhohn, Clyde. 1958. Ralph Linton 1893 - 1953: A biographical Memoir. National Academy of the Sciences.
Kroeber, A.L., Kluckhohn, C., 1952. Culture: a critical review of concepts and definitions, Cambrige, MA: Harvard University, 223 p.
Malinowski, B., 1962. Sex, Culture, and Myth, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Oyserman, D., 2002. “Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses”, in: Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., Kemmelmeier, M., Psychological bulletin, Vol. 128, No. 1, pp. 3-72.
Sapir, E., 1924. “Culture, Genuine and Spurious”, in: The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 401–429.
Singelis, T.M., 1994. “The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals” in: Singelis, T.M., Personality and social psychology bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 580-591.
Singelis, T.M., Triandis, H.C., Bhawuk D.P., 1995. “Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: a theoretical and measurement refinement”, Cross-cultural research, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 240-275.
Triandis, H.C., 1995. Individualism & collectivism, NY: Westview Press, 284 p.
Tylor, E.В., 1974. Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom, New York: Gordon Press, 426 p.

Abstract views: 156
PDF Downloads: 117
Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
Danyliuk, I., Kozytska, I., & Shykovets, S. (2018). The cultural syndrome "individualism-collectivism" and its psychological peculiarities including well-being of regional communities’ representatives in Ukraine. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 30(6), 55-61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2018.6.08