The representation features of the personal experience substructures of students with different self-concept profiles


Keywords: Self-concept profiles; self-perception; individual experience.

Abstract

 The article is devoted to the substructures of the personal component of individual experience research. In the framework of theoretical analysis, the structural organization of individual experience is reviewed. The author's position consists in sticking to the O.M. Laktionov three-component model of the experience. During the theoretical analysis contemporary studies devoted to the study of individual experience are reviewed. Several substructures of the personal component of individual experience, that require attentive study, are defined. The self-concept notion is analyzed. For the first time, an analysis of the features of relationship between the feeling of self-concept well-being and the personal experience substructures are presented. The analysis, described in this article, is a continuation of the research, which devoted to the study of self-concept in the framework of the structure of the students` personal component of individual experience, during which on the basis of analysis the substructures of personal experience formation features the self-concept profiles were received. Four self-concept profiles were taken into consideration out of the results of the study: the "Conflict profile": persons for whom the simultaneous inclusion of the prosperous and problematic types of self-perception is inherent; "Prosperous profile": persons for whom the prosperous self-concept perception, that combines with low level of problem self-concept perception, is inherent; "Tendency to well-being": persons who are characterized by the tendency to decrease the negative evaluation of their self-concept, having the average indicators of their self-concept well-being; "Tendency to conflict": individuals, who are characterized by average indicators of their self-concept perception in a problematic context in a tendency to decrease the assessment of their self-concept well-being. Directly in the course of the work, described in the article, a comparative analysis of students with different profiles was performed, that was based on the degree of representation of individual experience personal component substructures. The comparison was made using the rank criterion of Kruskal-Wallis. During the comparison, the following results were obtained: for the students with different self-concept profiles was not revealed any differences in the indicators of self-esteem, neuroticism, extraversion, cooperation, conscientiousness, planning self-regulation, self-regulation flexibility, goal purpose in life orientation, and such values as conformance, traditions, kindness, universality and security. Openness to experience, modeling, results estimation, independence, general level of self-regulation, process and result orientation, locus of control myself, general life meaningfulness and independence as a value were the most expressive for students with a prosperous self-concept profile, and the least expressive – for students with a conflict profile and profile with a tendency to conflict. Programming, as well as the stimulation, achievement and power values were the most expressive for the students with a tendency to a prosperous self-perception. The locus of life control and hedonism as the value was found the most expressive among the students with a tendency to a conflict in their own self-perception; the least expressive it was for students with a prosperous profile.

References

Alexandrov Y. I., Krylov A.K., & Arutyunova K. R. (2017). Activity during Learning and the Nonlinear Differentiation of Experience. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences, 21(4), 391-405.
Denault A. S., & Poulin F. (2016). What adolescents experience in organized activities: Profiles of individual and social experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 42, 40-48.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
Ivaschenko A. V. (2000). Personality Self-concept in native psychology. A. V. Ivaschenko, V. S. Agapov, I. V. Baryshnikova. M .: MGSA. - 153 p. [In Russian].
Иващенко A. B. (2000). Я-концепция личности в отечественной психологии. A. B. Иващенко, B. C. Агапов, И. В. Барышникова. М.: Изд. МГСА. - 153 с.
Kim, W. (2008). The Relation between Self-Concept Differentiation, Self-concept Integration and Psychological Well-being. Korea Journal of Counseling, 9(3), 1043-1061.
Kryazh I. V. (2007). Social Time in the Views of Residents of Eastern and Western Ukraine. Visnik of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; A Series of «Psychology», 771, 137-145. [In Russian].
Кряж И. В. (2007). Социальное время в представлениях жителей восточной и западной Украины. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія психологія, 771, 137-145.
Laktionov A. N. (1998). The Coordinates of individual experience. Kharkov: Business-Inform, 1998. - 492 p. [In Russian].
Лактионов А. Н. (1998). Координаты индивидуального опыта. Харьков: Бизнес-Информ, 1998. – 492 с.
Laktionov, O. M. (2000). Structural and dynamic organization of individual experience. dis ... Doctor of Psychological Sciences: 19.00.01. K. - 374 p. [In Ukrainian].
Лактіонов, О.М. (2000). Структурно-динамічна організація індивідуального досвіду. дис. ... доктора психологічних наук: 19.00.01. К. - 374 с.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583.
Radyuk O. M. (2016) "Big Five" of Personality Characteristics. II International Congress of the Cognitive-behavioral Psychotherapy Association: a Collection of Scientific Articles, St. Petersburg: SINEL, 92-104. [In Russian].
Радюк О. М. (2016) «Большая пятёрка» личностных особенностей. II Международный съезд Ассоциации когнитивно-поведенческой психотерапии: сборник научных статей, Санкт-Петербург: СИНЭЛ, 92-104.
Rollins, L., Gibbons, J. A., & Cloude, E. B. (2018). Affective change greater for unpleasant than pleasant events in autobiographical memory of children and adults: A retrospective study. Cognitive Development, 47, 46-52.
Sevostianov P. (2018). The Self-concept in the Personal Component of Individual Experience Structure. Visnik of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; A Series of «Psychology», 64, 51-55.
Sevostianov P. O. (2018) The Relationship Between the Openness of Experience and the Semantic-life Orientation of Students. Visnik of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University; A Series of «Psychology», 63, 12-16. [In Ukrainian].
Севост`янов П. О. (2018). Взаємозв’язок відкритості досвіду та смисложиттєвих орієнтацій у студентів. Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія «Психологія», 63, 12-16.
Shvalb Yu. M. (2005). Psychological Forms of Life Experience Fixation. Actual problems of psychology: Psychological hermeneutics. N.V. Chepeva. (Ed.). K .: Milenium, 2 (3), 14-20. [In Russian].
Швалб Ю. М. (2005). Психологические формы фиксации жизненного опыта. Актуальні проблеми психології: Психологічна герменевтика. За ред. Н. В.Чепелєвої. К.: Міленіум, 2(3), 14-20.
Smith, J. D. (2013). Self-concept: Autopoiesis as the Basis for a Conceptual Framework. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(1), 32-46.

Abstract views: 8
PDF Downloads: 5
Published
2019-04-30
How to Cite
Sevostianov, P. (2019). The representation features of the personal experience substructures of students with different self-concept profiles. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 32(2), 30-35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2019.2.04