Human rights in the field of health care protection by the European court of human rights
Keywords:
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Health Care; Human Rights; European Court of Human Rights; Right to Life.
Abstract
The urgency of the issue studied is stipulated by the need to understand the state of human rights in health care implementation through an analysis of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights The purpose of the study is to clarify understanding of the content of human rights in the field of health care by the European Court of Human Rights (following the Court's practice on Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) and to identify ways of improving these rights. The main approach to research on the issue of human rights protection in the field of health care is to systematically analyze the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The expediency of adopting a separate protocol to Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the subject matter of which will be human rights in the field of health care, which can be an effective means of protecting human rights in the field of health care, is indicated.References
1. Andorno, R. (2005). The Oviedo Convention: A European Legal Framework at the Intersection of Human Rights and Health Law. Journal of International Biotechnology Law, 2, 133–143.
2. Andorno, R. (2013). International Policy and a Universal Conception of Human Dignity. Human Dignity in Bioethics: From Worldviews to the Public Square New York: Routledge, 127-141.
3. Buletsa, S., Drozd, O., Yunin, O., Mohilevskyi, L. (2018). Medical Error: Civil and Legal Aspect. Georgian Medical News,3(276),156-62.
4. Council of Europe (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
5. European Commission of Human Rights (1984). Case of X. v. Germany, Application no. 10565/83. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-86040%22]}
6. European Court of Human Rights (1997). Case of D. v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 30240/96. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58035.
7. European Court of Human Rights (2006). Case of Popov v. Russia. Application no. 26853/04. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76341.
8. European Court of Human Rights (2007). Case of Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, Application nos. 9852/03, 13413/04. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83588.
9. European Court of Human Rights (2007). Case of Yakovenko v. Ukraine, Application no. 15825/06. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82987.
10. European Court of Human Rights (2013). Case of Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, Application no. 28005/08. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117134.
11. Nys, H., Stultiens, L., Borry, P., Goffin, T., Dierickx, K. (2007). Patient rights in EU Member States after the ratification of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Health Policy, 83, 223–235.
12. Posner, E.A. (2014). The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press.
13. Rex, M. (1980). Human Rights and Civil Rights. Philosophical Studies, 37, 391-403.
14. Tumay, M. (2017). The Subsidiary Protection of European Convention on Human Rights. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 185-214.
15. United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
16. United Nations (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
2. Andorno, R. (2013). International Policy and a Universal Conception of Human Dignity. Human Dignity in Bioethics: From Worldviews to the Public Square New York: Routledge, 127-141.
3. Buletsa, S., Drozd, O., Yunin, O., Mohilevskyi, L. (2018). Medical Error: Civil and Legal Aspect. Georgian Medical News,3(276),156-62.
4. Council of Europe (1950). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
5. European Commission of Human Rights (1984). Case of X. v. Germany, Application no. 10565/83. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-86040%22]}
6. European Court of Human Rights (1997). Case of D. v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 30240/96. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58035.
7. European Court of Human Rights (2006). Case of Popov v. Russia. Application no. 26853/04. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-76341.
8. European Court of Human Rights (2007). Case of Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, Application nos. 9852/03, 13413/04. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83588.
9. European Court of Human Rights (2007). Case of Yakovenko v. Ukraine, Application no. 15825/06. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82987.
10. European Court of Human Rights (2013). Case of Salakhov and Islyamova v. Ukraine, Application no. 28005/08. Retrieved from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117134.
11. Nys, H., Stultiens, L., Borry, P., Goffin, T., Dierickx, K. (2007). Patient rights in EU Member States after the ratification of the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Health Policy, 83, 223–235.
12. Posner, E.A. (2014). The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press.
13. Rex, M. (1980). Human Rights and Civil Rights. Philosophical Studies, 37, 391-403.
14. Tumay, M. (2017). The Subsidiary Protection of European Convention on Human Rights. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 185-214.
15. United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
16. United Nations (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Abstract views: 60 PDF Downloads: 48
Published
2020-04-30
How to Cite
Kuchuk, A. (2020). Human rights in the field of health care protection by the European court of human rights. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 38(2), 50-53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33531/farplss.2020.2.9
Issue
Section
Articles
