Genesis of memory phenomenon in socio-humanitarian cognition: review of research topics and theoretical resources

Keywords: memory; memory studies; memory environment; memory «boom»; phenomenology of memory; memory models; skills.


The purpose of the following scientific exploration is to represent a systematic study of memory genesis through epochs and centuries of the most significant philosophical concepts and ideas. Therefore, the phenomenon of memory in socio-humanitarian knowledge in our scientific research involves a philosophical study of the social sciences and humanities results, as well as their interdisciplinary nature in understanding the crucial aspects of the memory. Philosophical study of the phenomenon of memory challenges clarification of the subject field of research as an object marked by this concept throughout its progress. Before starting to research memory as a profound system, it is required to overview the fundamental memory genesis concepts, i.e., the categories on which it is grounded. The study of the memory phenomenon proves our attention to the history of its perception in philosophy, ascertaining the stages of the memory field subject organization, i.e., such research fields, and subjects that succeeding converted a research source for the development of the memory philosophy. The declared approach allows one to explain the basic categories that define the categorical context, i.e. what is indicated by 'memory' issue, how, and what subject field of memory research is provided in its genesis. Besides, the genesis itself is the configuration of an objective connection between memory matters. At the same time, the philosophical interpretation of the memory concept demands a study of methodological approaches and views, helping philosophers and researches to represent distinctive meanings of the memory concepts determined in various philosophical or socio-humanitarian studies and how this memory representation served the practical activities of science. The author's analysis of the genesis of the phenomenon of memory increase and comprehension of memory as a holistic system holds the proposed classification of structure stages of philosophical theory in understanding the nature and structure of the "memory" category is represented in this scientific exploration for the first time. The continued profound scientific study conducted at the Memory Institute in 2016-2020 preceded the development of this classification. In the represented research we have identified specific stages of the memory phenomenon genesis in the history of world philosophy, having verified the classifi-cation with the most prominent concepts, ideas, memory models, hypothetic issues, etc., as well as the praxiological judgment of the aforementioned memory phenome-non knowledge.


Augustine Aurelius. (2008). Blessed Augustine. Confession. Moscow: Ripol-klasik.
Aristotle. (2002). Nicomachean ethics. Kyiv: Aquilon-Plus.
Assman, J. (2004). Cultural memory: writing, memory of the past and political identity in the high cultures of antiquity. an Assman; transl. by Sokolskaya, MM. Мoscow: Slavic Language Culture.
Barnier, A.J., Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., Wilson R. A. (2008). A Conceptual and Empirical Framework for the Social Distribution of Cognition: The Case of Memory. Cognitive Systems Research, 9 (1): 33–51. doi: 10.1016 / j.cogsys.2007.07.002
Berger, P., Lukman, T. (1995). Social construction of reality. Moscow: Medium.
Bergson, A. (1979). Two forms of memory by A. Bergson. Psychology of memory. Moscow: Science. 61-75.
Bruno, G. (1993). Documenti della vita di G.Bruno, ed V. Spampanato. Florence: Scientia. 42-43.
Bruno, G. (1879-1891). Opere latine II (I), ed. Fiorentio et al. Naples and Florence: Voce de Mare. 1-77.
Durkheim, E. (1995). Sociology: its subject, method, purpose. Мoscow: Canon.
Ebbinghaus, G., Ben, A. (1998). Associative psychology. Moscow: AST.
Erasmus. (1996). Epistolae, ed. P.S. Allen and oth. IX. Geneva: CWE.
Filippov, A. F. (2008). Sociology of space. Saint-Petersburg: Vladimir Dal.
Godwin, J. (1979). Robert Fludd: hermetic philosopher and surveyor of two worlds. London: Thames and Hudson.
Halbwachs, M. (1950). La mémoire collective: Ouvrage posthume publié. Maurice Halbwachs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Halbwachs, M. (2007). Social framework of memory. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo.
Harris, C.B., Barnier, A.J., Sutton J. S., Keil P.G. (2014). Couples as Socially Distributed Cognitive Systems: Remembering in Everyday Social and Material Contexts. Memory Studies, 7 (3). 285–297. doi: 10.1177 / 1750698014530619
Hegel G.. IN. Ф. Lectures on the philosophy of spirit: Berlin 1827/1828; lane. with him. K. Александрова. M. :Ed. House "Delo" RANKhIGS, 2014. 303 with.
Hobbes, T. (1989). Essays, in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Thomas Hobbes. Мoscow: Mysl.
Hoerl, C. (2001). The Phenomenology of Episodic Recall, in Hoerl & McCormack. New York: Oxford University Press. 315-338.
Huebner, B. (2013). Macrocognition: A Theory of Distributed Minds and Collective Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof: oso / 9780199926275.001.0001
Ivanova, O.B. (2001). Identification as a sign of social maturity of social group: Dis. Cand. sociol. Sciences: 22.00.01. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University after Karazin. 178-192.
Kirchhoff, M.D. (2016). Composition and Transactive Memory Systems. Philosophical Explorations, 19 (1). 59–77. doi: 10.1080 / 13869795.2016.1085593
Kononov, I., Hobta, S., Shchudlo, S. (2008). Donbass and Galicia in the regional system of Ukraine. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing. №3. 73-98.
Kuhn, T. (1975). The structure of scientific revolutions. Moscow: Progress.
Laktionov, A.N. (2010). Coordinates of individual experience, 2nd ed. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University after Karazin.
Locke, D. (1990). The experience of human understanding. Мoscow: Mysl.
Lullius. R., Erigena J. S. (1960). The Art of Ramon Lull: An Approach to it through Lull's Theory of the Elements. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, XVII (1964). 115-173; Ibid., XXIII. 1-44.
Mamardashvili, M. (2000). Aesthetics of thinking. Moscow: Moscow School of Political Studies.
Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2004). History of psychology. Мoscow: Academia.
Mauss, M. J.-Ch., Halbwachs, M. (2004). Vers la fondation d'une psychologie collective de Jean-Christophe Marcel. Sociologie et sociétés, № 2. 73-90.
Moskovichi, S. (2006). Social psychology. Saint-Petersburg: Peter.
Nora, P. (1999). France. Memory by P. Nora. Saint-Petersburg: S.-Petersburg University.
Pierre, J. (1928). The Evolution of Memory and Time Notation. Paris: Édition A. Chahine.
Plato. State. (2000). Transl. from ancient Greek Koval, D. Kyiv: Osnovy.
Plato. (1936). Theaetetus. Translated from the Greek by Serezhnikov. Moscow: SOCECGIZ.
Popov, G. (1949). SRIM Archive (Memory SRI, by G. Popov) F. 3 ("Heritage of G. Popov" fund, Vienna 1940). Inv. 3, 1949 1. FC.1-7. 24 - 58. [Memory phenomenology: three Approaches to Study Memory. Manuscript]
Rebane, J. K. (1977). The principle of social memory. Philosophical sciences. № 5. 35-47.
Reese, E., Haden C. A., Fivush, R. (1993). Mother-Child Conversations About the Past: Relationships of Style and Memory over Time. Cognitive Development, 8 (4). 403–430. doi: 10.1016 / S0885-2014 (05) 80002-4
Riker, P. (2004). Memory, history, oblivion by Paul Riker. Moscow: Humanitarian Literature.
Robinson, J.A. (1976). Sampling autobiographical memory. Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 8. P.578-595.
Rozhdestvenskaya E.Y., Meshcherkina, E.U. (2006). Historical memory and policies of memorialization. Reforming Russia. Moscow: Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 198-213.
Rozhdestvenskaya, E. Y. (2011). Social memory as an object of sociological study. Moscow: Inter. Bulletin. 27–48.
Rubinstein, S. L. (2000). Fundamentals of general psychology. Saint-Petersburg: Peter.
Russell, B. (1996). Philosophical Dictionary of Reason, Matter and Morality Kiev: Port-Royal.
Sabourin, P. (1997). Perspective on the social memory of Maurice Halbwachs. Sociologie et sociétés, № 2. 139-161.
Shinkarenko, Y. (2002). Identity and life world in the context of modern civilization changes. Philosophical thought. №1. 68-84.
Shtompka, P. (1996). Sociology of social changes. Moscow: Aspekt-press.
Shulga, M.O. (1993). Ethnic self-identification of the personality. Kyiv: Irbis.
Spinoza, B. (1957). Selected works in 2 vols. Vol. 1, Benedict Spinoza. Мoscow: Politizdat.
Sutton, J. (2000). Batting, Habit and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill. Sport in Society, 10 (5). 763-786. doi: 10.1080 / 17430430701442462
Sutton, J. (1998). Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Szondi, L. (1956). Ich-Analyze. The basis for the development of deep psychology. Part 1. Bern: Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1947). Lehrbuch der Experimentellen Triebdiagnostik. Textband. Bern: Huber, Bern und Stuttgart.
Tard, G. (1998). Opinion and the crowd. Psychology of the crowd. Moscow: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences. 257-365.
Theiner, G., Colin, A., Goldstone, R.L. (2010). Recognizing Group Cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 11 (4). 378-395. doi: 10.1016 / j.cogsys.2010.07.002
Tocco, F. (1889). The Latin Opera by Giordano Bruno. Florence.
Tremblay, M.-A. (1988). Tourism and regional cultures before the crisis of the Quebec identity. Teoros, Revue québécoise de recherche en tourisme, vol. 7, № 1. Montreal: UQAM. 3-4.
Wilson, R. A. (2005). Collective Memory, Group Minds, and the Extended Mind Thesis. Cognitive Processing, 6 (4). 227–236. doi: 10.1007/s10339-005-0012-z
Wimsatt, W. C. (1986). Forms of Aggregativity, in A. Donagan, A. N. Perovich Jr., & Michael V. Wedin (eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer. 259–291. doi: 10.1007 / 978-94-009-5349-9_14
Wittgenstein, L. (1994). Philosophical research. Philosophical works. Moscow: Mysl. 75–92.
Volovyk, V.І. (2004). History philosophy. Course of lectures by Volovyk, V.І., 2d ed. Zaporizhzhia: Prosvita.
Vygotsky, L. (2016). Thinking and speech. Series "Anthology of World Pedagogy" St. Petersburg: National Education.
Yates, F. (1997). The Art of Memory. Saint Petersburg: University Book.
Zerniy, Y. O. (2009). State policy of memory as a factor of approval of Ukrainian national identity: author's ref. dis. for science. degree of sociology, 23.00.05 "Ethnopolitics and ethnostate studies». Kyiv: Prosvita.
Zinoviev, A. (2007). Logic of Science. Moscow: Exmo.

Abstract views: 78
PDF Downloads: 34
How to Cite
Maltsev, O. (2020). Genesis of memory phenomenon in socio-humanitarian cognition: review of research topics and theoretical resources. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 33(3), 63-75. Retrieved from