The memory phenomenon essence and the meaning of its concept


Keywords: memory; memory studies; memory environment; definition of memory; phenomenology of memory; memory concepts; skills.

Abstract

The purpose of the following scientific exploration is to outline a systematic study of the essence of the memory phenomenon meaning and its concept of the most significant philosophical concepts and ideas. Consequently, the phenomenon of memory in socio-humanitarian knowledge in our scientific research includes a philosophical reflection of the social sciences and humanities results, as well as their inter-disciplinary environment in following the essential aspects of the memory. Philosophical study of the phenomenon of memory challenges interpretation of the subject field of research as an object marked by this concept throughout its progress. In the present research of ‘memory’ as a profound system, we overview the fundamental memory concepts, i.e., the categories on which it is grounded.   The study of the memory phenomenon guides our attention to the history of its perception in philosophy i.e., such research fields, and subjects that succeeding con-verted a research source for the development of the memory philosophy. Therefore, we consider the philosophical context of the definition of memory in the socio-humanitarian sciences and philosophy, the concept of "memory", its subject field, studied by psychologists, sociologists, historians and philosophers. The following reflection remarks the main meanings considered in determining the subject field of memory to us, considering memory in the logical relations of thing-thing, properties, relations. The general approach, which incorporates the subject field of memory, its onto-logical meaning, is the relationship between man and reality (in individual memory), social group, community, society, and reality (in collective and social memory). From our viewpoint, the unifying "denominator" is the definition of the relationship be-tween the subject and reality, and the subject in its meaning allows the connection of ontological meaning with epistemological (because it is the subject that knows) and praxeological (carrying out activities) meanings. In this case, we consider that "ultimately" the carrier of memory is a person, in the social sense of the individual, even with the advent of artificial storage of the Internet, etc. In acknowledging the definition of the subject field of memory, we analyzed several definitions of "memory" in national and foreign philosophical literature, including those stated in specialized philosophical publications, encyclopedias, and dictionaries. Having reviewed the fundamental semantic relations in different definitions of memory, we note our working definition of memory, with which the Institute of Memory has been working since 2015. This definition was given by the Soviet academician G. Popov and is represented in his work "Phenomenology of Memory", which includes procedural significance, the problem of which was posed by Ameri-can philosophers.

References

Adorno, Th.W. (1963). What does it look like: Aufarbeitung der Vergangen- heit? Adorno Th.W. Eingriffe. New critical model. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Ayer, A.J. (1956). The Problem of Knowledge. London: Macmillan.
Bastid, R. (1970). Collective memory and sociology of bricolage. Sociologist. Yearbook. № 3.
Bergson, H. (1999). Creative evolution. Matter and memory. Munich: Ritter und Sohne.
Bergson, H. (1994). Matter and Memory, tr. by Paul, N.M., Palmer, W.S. New York: Zone Books.
Bernecker, S., Bogart, P. (2015). “Memory”, in Oxford Bibliographies Online: Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093 / obo / 9780195396577-0072
Bernecker, S., Kourken, M. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory. London: Routledge.
Blonsky, P.P. (1935). Memory and thinking. Moscow: Science.
Cambridge University Press. (2018). Philosophy Dictionary. Ginet, G. Memory: paradox of analysis. Cambridge: Cornell University.
Durkheim, E. (1991). On the division of social labor. Method of sociology. Moscow: Nauka.
Durkheim, E. (1995). Sociology: its subject, method, purpose. Мoscow: Canon.
Ebbinghaus, G., Ben, A. (1998). Associative psychology. Moscow: AST.
Golovin, Y. (1998). Dictionary of a practical psychologist. Moscow: AST, Harvest.
Janet, P. (2010). Psychological evolution of personality. Moscow: Academic Project.
Halbwachs, M. (1950). La mémoire collective: Ouvrage posthume publié. Maurice Halbwachs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Halbwachs, M. (2007). Social framework of memory. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo.
Hoerl, C. (1999). Memory, Amnesia and the Past. Mind & Language. № 14 (2). 227–251. doi: 10.1111 / 1468-0017.00111
Hutto, D., Myin, E. (2017). Evolving Enactivism: Basic Minds Meet Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jaspers, K. (1999). The question of guilt. On the political responsibility of Germany. Moscow: Progress. 38-60.
Jaspers, K. (1997). General psychopathology. Transl. by Hakobyan, L.O. Moscow: Praktika.
Leontiev, A.N. (1931). Memory development. Experiment, study of higher psychological functions. Moscow: Udarnik.
Locke, J. (1971). Memory. London: Macmillan.
Moyal-Sharrock, D. (2009). Wittgenstein and the Memory Debate. New Ideas in Psychology. № 27 (2). 213–227. doi: 10.1016 / j.newideapsych.2008.04.015
Myin, E., Zahidi, R. (2015). The Extent of Memory: From Extended to Extensive Mind. Moyal-Sharrock, Munz, & Coliva. 391–408. doi: 10.1515 / 9783110378795.391
Nora, P. (1999). France-memory. Transl: Hapaeva, D. Saint-Petersburg: S.-Peterb. University Press. 17-50.
Popov, G. (1949). SRIM Archive (Memory SRI, by G. Popov) F. 3 ("Heritage of G. Popov" fund, Vienna 1940). Inv. 3, 1949 1. FC.1-7. 24 - 58. [Memory phenomenology: three Approaches to Study Memory. Manuscript]
Ricouer, P. (2004). Memory. History. Oblivion. Moscow: Humanitarian Literature Press. 170-220. Access mode - https://istorex.ru/page/saveleva_im_a_v_poletaev_av_istoricheskaya_pamyat_k_voprosu_o_granitsakh_ponyatiya#_ftn5
Robbins, S. K. (2016). Misremembering. Philosophical Psychology, 29 (3). 432–447. doi: 10.1080 / 09515089.2015.1113245
Robbins, S.K. (2016). Representing the Past: Memory Traces and the Causal Theory of Memory. Philosophical Studies, 173 (11). 2993–3013. doi: 10.1007 / s11098-016-0647-x
Robinson, J.A. (1976). Sampling autobiographical memory. Cognitive Psychology. Vol. 8. 578-595.
Rogovin, M. (1967). Memory. Philosophical Encyclopedia. Editor-in-Chief Konstantinov, F.V. Vol.4, Science of Logic. Moscow: "Soviet Encyclopedia» (Scientific Council of the Soviet Encyclopedia Publishing House. Institute of Philosophy of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Encyclopedias. Dictionaries. References).
Rubinstein, S. L. (2000). Fundamentals of general psychology. Saint-Petersburg: Peter.
Russell, B. (1921). The Analysis of Mind, London: G. Allen & Unwin.
Russell, J., Hanna, R. (2012). A Minimalist Approach to the Development of Episodic Memory. Mind & Language, 27 (1). 29–54. doi: 10.1111 / j.1468-0017.2011.01434.x
Russell, B. (1996). Philosophical Dictionary of Reason. Matter and Morality. Kiev: Port-Royal.
Stanley, J. (2011). Know How. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093 / acprof: oso / 9780199695362.001.0001
Ryle, G. (2009). The Concept of Mind, London: Routledge.
Shemyakin, F.N. (1965). Automatisms of memory and thinking. Problems of engineering psychology. Psychology of memory., vol. 3. Leningrad: APN RSFSR.
Shtompka, P. (1996). Sociology of social changes. Moscow: Aspekt-press.
Stern, D. G. (1991). Models of Memory: Wittgenstein and Cognitive Science. Philosophical Psychology, 4 (2). 203–218. doi: 10.1080 / 09515089108573027
Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, Habit and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill. Sport in Society, 10 (5). 763–786. doi: 10.1080 / 17430430701442462
Sutton, J. (2009). Remembering. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 217–235.
Sutton, J. (1998). Philosophy and Memory Traces: Descartes to Connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Uyomov, A.I. (1997). Fundamentals of practical logic with tasks and exercises. Odessa: Odessa State University by I.I. Mechnikov.
Volovyk, V.І. (2004). History philosophy. Course of lectures by Volovyk, V.І., 2d ed. Zaporizhzhia: Prosvita.
Vygotsky, L. (2016). Thinking and speech. Series "Anthology of World Pedagogy" St. Petersburg: National Education.
Wittgenstein, L. (1994). Philosophical research. Philosophical works. Moscow: Mysl. 75–92.
Yolon, P. (2002). Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary (FES) Vol. VI. Institute of Philosophy. Moscow: Abris.
Zinchenko, P.I. (1959). Questions of psychology of memory, in collection: Psychological science in the USSR, vol. 1. Moscow: Nauka.
Zinoviev, A. (2007). Logic of Science. Moscow: Exmo.

Abstract views: 76
PDF Downloads: 4
Published
2020-04-30
How to Cite
Maltsev, O. (2020). The memory phenomenon essence and the meaning of its concept. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 38(2), 96-106. Retrieved from https://farplss.org/index.php/journal/article/view/694