COVID-19: the time for reconsidering and improving on-line learning in the context of medical education in Ukraine
AbstractThe purpose of this review article is to highlight peculiarities of distance learning and methodology of its implementation and improvement at the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology, Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy under the quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current paper highlights the main differences of distance learning from traditional classroom education in Ukraine. Moreover, we emphasise methods and forms of distance learning and some difficulties, which we faced in the state of COVID-19 emergency. However, transition from the traditional, in-person, learning to distance learning in the Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy during the COVID-19 pandemic was successful
2. Site of journal “eLearning industry”. elearningidustry.com. Retrieved from: https://elearningindustry.com/online-learning-statistics-and-trends.
3. Site of journal “Small business trends”. smallbiztrends.com. Retrieved from: https://smallbiztrends.com/2017/12/2018-e-learning-trends.htm.
4. Hlushko, N. L., Lenchuk, T. L., Matskevych, V. M., & Mytsyk, Y. O. (2020). The possibilities of pedagogical use of the distance system of training for the out-of-class independent work. Медична освіта, №4, P.10-13.
5. Ehizogie Edigin , Precious Obehi Eseaton , Hafeez Shaka , Pius Ehiremen Ojemolon , Iriagbonse Rotimi Asemota & Emmanuel Akuna. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on medical postgraduate training in the United States.Medical Education Online, VOL. 25, 1774318.
6. Kamran Aghakhani & Mohammadreza Shalbafan. (2020). What COVID-19 outbreak in Iran teaches us about virtual medical education. Medical Education Online, VOL. 25, 1770567
7. Mohsin Abedi & Dina Abedi. (2020). A letter to the editor: the impact of COVID-19 on intercalating and non-clinical medical students in the UK. Medical Education Online, VOL. 25, 1771245
8. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro vyshchu osvitu” [Law on Higher Education] [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18
9. Khaled Zehry et al. (2011). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15 3163–3167 3165,
10. Marchuk N.YU. (2013). Psihologo-pedagogicheskie osobennosti distancionnogo obucheniya.- Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii. [Psychological and pedagogical features of distance learning. - Pedagogical education in Russia]. № 4, p.78-85.
12. Topol І. O. (2018). Vprovadzhennya onlajn-kursu yak elementu distancіjnoї formi navchannya u navchal'nij proces kafedri mіkrobіologії, vіrusologії ta іmunologії. [Introduction of an online course as an element of distance learning in the educational process of the Department of Microbiology, Virology and Immunology]. Medichna osvіta. № 1. P .58-61.
13. Pei L, Wu H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. (1):1666538. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.
14. Richmond H, Copsey B, Hall AM, et al. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions. BMC Med Educ. 17(1):227.
15. Muilenburg LY, Berge ZL. (2005) Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Educ. 26(1):29–48.
16. Terrell SR, Dringus L. (2000). An investigation of the effect of learning style on student success in online learning environment. J Educ Technol Syst. 28:3.
17. Omar ND, Hassan H, Atan H. (2012). Student engagement in online learning: learners attitude toward E-mentoring. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 67(67):464–475.
18. Johnson SD, Aragon SR, Shaik N, et al. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. J Interact Learn Res. 11(1):29–49.
19. Robinson CC, Hullinger H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: student engagement in online learning. J Educ Bus. 84(2):101–109.
Abstract views: 209 PDF Downloads: 101