Transformation of archetypes and symbolic images in the psyche through group psychotherapy. Case study (part one).


  • O.D. Lytvynenko I.I. Mechnikov ONU
Keywords: group psychotherapy, personal fairy tale, analytical psychology, fairy tales analysis, archetype, symbol.

Abstract

The article presents the first part of the study of the results of group psychotherapeutic work on the example of one case.  The procedure of group work and the task of the therapeutic program are described. The study involved a qualitative analysis in which individual psychological and behavioral characteristics of each of the participants in the group process were identified.  The subject of discussion of qualitative analysis was a personal fairy tale, which was written in the process of working in a group with a special therapeutic program in two versions – initial and final. The personal fairy tale was based on Jung's analytical approach, represented and developed in the psyche of archetypes: Ego, Person, Shadow, Anima, Animus and archetypical and symbolic images: Spirit, Forest, Sleep and others. There is shown  an illustration of the spontaneous objectivity of an archetype capable of unifying the personality, strengthening awareness ofthe intellectual situation and integrating the necessary information from the unconscious. Qualitative analysis allowed us to consider a personal fairy tale and understand what this text reports and how (the way of submission, distribution of time, events, space and characters). Qualitative analysis also proved that a personal fairy tale helped to identify and overcome problems, thanks to which it contributed to the formation and development of her personality.

References

1. Bednenko, G. (2012). Beauty or the beast: a magic tale and an individual myth. Moscow, Pryahi [In Russian].
2. Bezrukikh, A. & Pilyavina , O. (1999). Archetypes in psychotherapy. Retrieved from http://jungland.ru/node/1115 [In Russian].
3. Vachkov, I. (2007). Fairytale therapy. The development of self-awareness through a psychological tale. Moscow [In Russian].
4. Grekova, T. (2006). About archetypal of development symbols. Herald of Moscow University. [In Russian].
5. Dieckmann, H., Drozdetskaya, P. & Selensky, V. (2000). Jungian analysis of fairy tales. Legend and inatelling. Appendix: Methods of Analytical Psychology St. Petersburg: Academic project [In Russian].
6. Lytvynenko, O. (2016). Using fairy tale therapy in the program of group psycho-revolutionary work. Bulletin of the Odessa National University named after I.I. Mechnikov. Series: Psychology, T. 21, Vol. 3(41). p. 160-167 [In Ukrainian].
7. Leitz, G. (1994). Psychodrama: Theory and Practice. Classical psychodrama (Moreno. J. L. Ed.). Progress Publishing Group [In Russian].
8. Parki, M. (2005). Tales to manage change. How to use fairy tales for the development of people and organizations. Moscow, The Good Book [In Russian].
9. Fopel, K. (2013). Workshop Of Stories: Writing Personal Stories in a Group of Psychological Work. Moscow, Genesis [In Russian].
10. Fry, N. (2002) Archetypical analysis: myth theory (Zubrytska M. Transl.). Anthology of world literary and critical thought of the twentieth century (2nd, Revised and augmented ed). Lviv, Litopys [In Ukrainian].
11. Jung, K. (2005). Archetype and Symbol. Moscow, Progress [In Russian].
12. Jung K.G. Soul and Myth: Six Archetypes. Kyiv, Ukraine [In Russian].

Abstract views: 58
PDF Downloads: 31
Published
2020-12-15
How to Cite
Lytvynenko, O. (2020). Transformation of archetypes and symbolic images in the psyche through group psychotherapy. Case study (part one). Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 42(6), 47-54. Retrieved from https://farplss.org/index.php/journal/article/view/768