Gender aspect of self‐determination of a leader and the pecularities of decision‐makings


  • D. Chmerynska G.S.Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAES of Ukraine
Keywords: professional and management self‐determination, self‐realization, management decision, gender peculiarity guidance, management quality.

Abstract

Professional management self‐determination is defined by a person who combines the generalized understanding of the management and generalized ideas about himself or herself determining the meaning of the profession. Dynamics of professional selfmanagement is defined in changing the attitude towards a person as the subject of management and changing the criteria of personal relationships. More profound and updated professional and managerial self‐determination is manifested throughout professional life of a person. It is reflected in the fact that the image of professional managers is expanding and the acceptance of a person as a professional is being corrected, and the relationship to a managing profession and his or her part in it is reviewed. The result of each phase is the adoption of individual criteria of management excellence and the identification with them. Influence of gender aspects on professional self‐determination of an individual is not only the process of selfrealization, but also the choice of way of life, as well as its relationship with social environment and personal social experience obtaining. According to the ideas, decision‐making is an important aspect of leadership. Organizational, situational and personal factors are signified that promote and prevent effective solutions. Two features dealing with problem situations have been found: the focus on existing patterns, the generation of new solutions.  

References

1. Andreeva H. M. Psychology of social cognition. Moscow, 1997. P. – 340.
2. Babayeva L. V., Chirikova A. E. Women in Business // Sociological researches. ‐ 1996. ‐ №3. ‐ P. – 8 –
18.
3. Zhyhaylo N. I. Communicative management: textbook. ‐ Lviv: Lviv Ivan Franko National University,
2012 ‐ 368 p.
4. Ilyin E. P. Differential Psychophysiology of man and woman. ‐ SPb .: St. Petersburg, 2002. P – 544.
5. Maksymenko S. D. Genesis of personality implementation: scientific monograph / S. D.
Maksymenko. ‐ K .: KMM, 2006. P. – 2 5 p. ‐ Bibliography: P. – 246‐255 (339 name).
6. Maksymenko S. D. Genesis of personality existence: Monograph / S. D. Maksymenko.‐ K .: Company
"KMM", 2006. P – 239 p. ‐ Bibliography: P. – 228‐239 (339 name).
7. Podosinikov S. A. Psychological peculiarities of the professional vision formation among students.
Materials of interuniversity scientific‐practical conference. M .: MOSTS, 1998, P. – 120‐130.
8. Tytarenko T. M. Life claims of a personality in gender context/ T. M. Tytarenko // Problems of
general and pedagogical psychology: Volume of scientific works of G. S. Kostyuk Institute of Psychology. T.
5. Part 6. ‐ K., 2003.
9. Stolin V. V. Self‐consciousness. M .: MGU, 1983. P. – 274.
10. Strelkov Y. K. Psychology of life crises and significant events // Psychological journal, 1993. T. 14.
№5. P. – 95 – 115.
Published
2016-05-16
How to Cite
Chmerynska, D. (2016). Gender aspect of self‐determination of a leader and the pecularities of decision‐makings. Fundamental and Applied Researches in Practice of Leading Scientific Schools, 16(4), 137-142. Retrieved from https://farplss.org/index.php/journal/article/view/85